ITYT Travel Forums  

Go Back   ITYT Travel Forums > General Travel Topics > General Travel > Potpourri
User Name
Password
Portal Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read





Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2001, 08:00 PM
dbaker dbaker is offline
Senior Member
First Class
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IAH/HOU
Posts: 2,355
This topic in the News forum shows that Airtran is filing suit against the man who shut down ATL after breaching security.

The guy clearly is pretty clueless and had no idea what the impact of his actions were. He ran in the [exit] of a security checkpoint moments before the terminals were cleared and the airport was shut down for hours, yet did not realize that the security breach was about him. He waited outside and then tried to board his flight when the airport re-opened.

The suit seems to not be about the fact that he caused the airport to shut down, but that he was negligent for not contacting authorities after the airport was shut down.

What's an appropriate punishment for this? It seems inappropriate to penalize someone for being an idiot, especially since the airport's methods for guarding the security exits is similarly ill-conceived. Then again, it's reasonable to argue a certain level of common sense.

Thoughts?

Daniel

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2001, 08:00 PM
dbaker dbaker is offline
Senior Member
First Class
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IAH/HOU
Posts: 2,355
This topic in the News forum shows that Airtran is filing suit against the man who shut down ATL after breaching security.

The guy clearly is pretty clueless and had no idea what the impact of his actions were. He ran in the [exit] of a security checkpoint moments before the terminals were cleared and the airport was shut down for hours, yet did not realize that the security breach was about him. He waited outside and then tried to board his flight when the airport re-opened.

The suit seems to not be about the fact that he caused the airport to shut down, but that he was negligent for not contacting authorities after the airport was shut down.

What's an appropriate punishment for this? It seems inappropriate to penalize someone for being an idiot, especially since the airport's methods for guarding the security exits is similarly ill-conceived. Then again, it's reasonable to argue a certain level of common sense.

Thoughts?

Daniel

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2001, 04:57 AM
RyJones RyJones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: PUW - Pullman, Washington
Posts: 124
Send a message via MSN to RyJones
I would take this turkey out and beat him with a wet noodle until he dies. How can you be travelling in the US and not know we're in a new, perky, paranoid time?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2001, 04:57 AM
RyJones RyJones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: PUW - Pullman, Washington
Posts: 124
Send a message via MSN to RyJones
I would take this turkey out and beat him with a wet noodle until he dies. How can you be travelling in the US and not know we're in a new, perky, paranoid time?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement - Airstream Trailer - Aquarium Forum - Royal Forum - Book Forum - Yoga Forum - Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum - Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Fiberglass RV Forum - U2 Forum
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

eXTReMe Tracker